![[Lens Review] Pentax Takumar 35mm f/3.5](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.jerfareza.camera%2Ffeatured-images%2F7106-pentax-takumar-35mm.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Updated December 2022: added more film photo samples!
Table of Contents
The Takumar 35mm is a versatile m42 mount lens from the old days of Pentax. How does the lens perform nowadays? Let’s find out!
Before we begin, if you’re interested in more reviews on Takumar lenses, I’ve previously covered the super fast 50mm f/1.4 here.
Build and Handling
Takumar 35mm was first introduced in 1959 as Auto-Takumar. The variant that I own, Super-Multi-Coated (SMC), was from around 1971 onwards. As always, with all Pentax Takumar lenses, the build quality is amazing. This lens is on the small, lighter side and feels very comfortable to hold. The focus ring and aperture ring are smooth and buttery.
I once dropped this lens from a meter or so, and it hit the asphalt hard. Though it resulted in a sizeable dent near the front element and a huge dent on the lens cap, amazingly, the ‘scar’ does not affect lens operation. I would suggest being very careful, though, as a problem with the manual/auto switch might render the aperture ring unusable.
More in this series…
- [Lens Review] Industar 50mm f3.5
- [Lens Review] Sun System 65-130mm f/3.5
- [Lens Review] Helios 44-2 58mm f2
- [Lens Review] Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4
Image Quality
I tested this lens on analog (Fujica ST701 and Pentax Spotmatic) and digital (Sony A7ii).
First, the result using film cameras. Honestly, I like the rendering more on film since the lens was made for film anyways. The pairing just can’t be beaten. The photos came out with that yesteryear quality, depending on the film roll used. Though the rendering is sharp in the middle, the vignetting on the corners can be very apparent at times.
How about going digital? I went with Sony A7ii for this one. And make no mistake, it’s just as good as in film, if not better. No complaint here, of course, since the lens performs well in digital. But if I want to be particular, shooting digitally does tend to undo the ‘character’ built into the lens. As you can see in the following photos, the corners look sharp with minimum vignetting. The very opposite of film.
Overall Impression
What’s the verdict? Let’s be honest, the 35mm is not a focal length that I use a lot in my shots. For street photography, I always think 50mm is the perfect spot to simulate the view from our perspective. And I would use either wider lenses or telephoto lenses for landscape.
But once you try a 35mm, you know you’ll be getting something different. And I feel that. After using this Takumar for a while, I was seduced by its simplicity. I can put more background into the view while keeping the main object at the center stage. Combined with its fantastic build, Takumar 35mm is, without a doubt, a very good all-rounder lens.
I’ll give a magnificent 8/10 for this lens!
More Sample Photos
Film
Digital
